Carrying The Burden
Last time I looked Lebanon was in Asia. It must be so hard to carry the white man's burden so close to home. Du |
We are guilty of many errors and many faults but our worst crime is abandoning the children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many of the things we need can wait. The child cannot. Right now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made, and his senses are being developed. To him we cannot answer "Tomorrow." His name is "Today." â Gabriela Mistral.
Last time I looked Lebanon was in Asia. It must be so hard to carry the white man's burden so close to home. Du |
A Banana Loaf For Siun
How to make it:
I don't know how long it keeps because in my household it's always been eaten down to the last crumb within 24 hours. Baked Apricots with Almond Paste for Grania
How to make it:
|
Today's posting in the occasional series of guest postings is from "Badger" of Missing Links. Most recent postings on "Missing Links"
He covers the explosive vote engineered by Al-Hakim in the Iraqi parliament for "federalism." This is a major story. The consequences of that vote are likely to be disastrous not only for Iraq, not only for the Middle East in general, but also for the circa 140,000 American And yet America desperately needs a more informed populace and a more informed political debate. "Badger's" blog helps fill in some of those gaps. I wrote about "Missing Links" back on September 18th. I'm impressed by his very solid work as I said back then:
But don't take my word for it, judge for yourselves. Badger kindly agreed to do a guest posting. I suggest you read his posting here. Then head "upriver" his place and read his latest "Iraqi federalism vote: Behind the contradictory numbers" and also that you add his blog to your daily reading. There will be no other postings today. markfromireland Iraqi Federalism Off To A Shaky StartWe're used to the idea that the Western press beautifies the American wars with its "campaigns" and its "casualties". It's always been a little harder to get a handle on the political beautification.When the Iraqi parliament voted Wednesday on a bill to set up procedures for establishing federal regions in Iraq, the Western press reported a beautiful democratic event, and a victory for the federalists.The Iraqi press reported a procedure that reeked of skulduggery. Here's how I tried to sort through the different accounts in the immediate aftermath of the vote, a picture-perfect illustration of"political beautification". (Since then, AP has filed what I guess they call a "row-back", retelling their story to bring it a little closer to reality. You can read that here). Baghdad papers Azzaman and Al-Mada said the vote on the federalism-procedures bill on Wednesday was 138 yeas out of 138 voting, in other words one-half of the 275 parliament members plus one, with all of the others boycotting the session. Another standard source, the pan-Arab paper Al-Hayat, said the vote was 148 in favor, out of 175 voting. Al-Sabah described the yea vote as "a majority, with 140 present." Ah, you say, surely the New York Times cleared this up. Actually the New York Times didn't offer its own figure, even though it had five staff people working on this. It said the Associated Press said the bill passed with 140 yea votes, without mentioning what the attendance was. Of maybe you prefer the Le Monde approach to this. They didn't report any vote count at all, noting only that the bill was supported by the UIA which has 138 members, and the Kurdish alliance, which has 52, thus ensuring "une solide majorite". So there you have it. The English-speaking result is a non-controversial 140 votes in favor, end of story, nothing to see here. The Arabic-speaking result is a squeaker, passing by barely one vote, suggestive of skulduggery. The French-speaking version is that the vote isn't worth reporting because this was supported by two blocs which, if all of their members had voted with the bloc, which they didn't, would have ensured a solid majority. Al-Hayat, with its 148 yeas out of 175 voting, is the statistical outlier. Voting In The DarkOkay with the numbers? Now let's look at the meaning. Various Arabic newspapers noted that the Speaker of Parliament, one Mashhadani, was one of those boycotting the session, which was then presided over by his deputy, Khalid Atia. "According to al-Hayat, Khalif al-Alayan, a leader of one of the mainboycotting groups, said: "This [the voting procedure] was done by collusion", followed by a cryptic remark, which -- this is only a wild guess, but -- looks like where the editor on the desk said "why don't we just leave the rest of this out". Azzaman says several parliamentarians spoke of connivance, and some of outright illegality in the passage of this. (Apparently this was voted on clause by clause, and the process took several hours, some alleging that this was drawn out to give time to pressure enough members to come in and vote, and the time it took was over the legally-permitted time for doing this). Al-Mada is a little more helpful on the overall picture. They report that Mashhadani, before he too joined the boycott, ordered that the session be closed, ordering out even the members' staff people, and he cut off the direct electronic transmission of the session to the outside, creating a hermetically sealed environment. Which would mean there weren't any reporters there to count the votes. Of course that doesn't explain why the reporters couldn't have had recourse to an official record after the vote was over, but I guess there are some things we are not meant to know. Bottom Line: Is Iran Undermining Our Number-System ?"Well and good, Badger", you say, "but come to the point. Who are the black hats here?" Actually in the English-language and the French-language worlds, there weren't any black hats here. The bill passed, by a non-controversial majority, and that was that. In my opinion, this was open-and-shut for the NYT and its information-allies, because Iraqi "federalism" is a foregone conclusion for the US and its allies. A smoother national outcome would have been nice, but it appears the default was always creative destruction, which now means an easy-going federalism is a lot more attractive than trying to put the pieces back together for a strong and competent central government. I realize this doesn't make rational sense in any world you and I are capable of imagining, but there you have it. (If there had been a problem with the vote in the English-speaking version, it would have been the fault of the Iranians, but you knew that). The newspapers that reported this passed by only one vote, however, had to face up to the whodunnit question. In specific terms, the finger points at four members of the party that is headed by Ayad Allawi, the so-called "Iraqi List", which being supposedly of the strong-central-government persuasion, was expected to oppose this bill by joining the boycott. Allawi is the former CIA asset from London, who went on to become interim head of the Iraqi government between the Bremer and Jaafari administrations. Azzaman names the four members of his group that had naturally been expected to join the boycott. Had they joined the boycott, Azzaman said, the bill would have failed, but unexpectedly they attended and voted for it, and that was what tipped the balance. Azzaman names the four of them, in dramatic fashion, under a separate headline: "The four that changed history". But the paper also says there were parliamentarians complaining of "direct Iranian pressure". In any event, the Azzaman take on the whole process is that the passage of this bill plunges Iraq into a tunnel of sectarian and racial division from which there will be no exit. The reporter says this bill faced "vehement popular opposition". And he quotes someone from the Fadhila wing of the UIA, which along with the Sadrists, opposed this bill as untimely: The Fadhila person said what has been a partial and latent civil war is now going to come out into the open. If you want a detailed, dispassionate analysis of the procedures outlined in this bill, indicating why this could well be a slippery slope to long-term instability, you should read the essay on this by historian Reidar Visser, at The Draft Law for the Formation of Regions: A Recipe for Permanent Instability in Iraq?, and also his update on this at Iraq Federalism Bill Adopted Amid Protests and Joint Shiite-Sunni Boycott. Luckily, Sovereignty Is Not An IssueThe other unusual story of that day, apart from a mortar attack and spectacular fire at an American ammunition depot, was this: US military personnel, dressed in civilian clothes, broke into the Central Courthouse in Baghdad and removed the former Electricity Minister, who had just been sentenced to two years in jail for fraud, and took him to the American Embassy for safekeeping. (Al-Hayat version in the piece linked to above). He is a dual Iraqi-US citizen, and the Americans probably thought he might not do well in the all-Iraqi prison system. The Iraqi Justice Minister had some choice words to say about this. |
|
Bwaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha"Benign environment" listen you idiot. Nowhere in Iraq is a benign environment. Nowhere. A country in which the US has engaged in war crime, after warcrime, after warcrime, isn't a "benign environment." A country in which every single American (and allied) soldier, diplomat, civil servant, and local collaborator, can be accurately described in just two words: Leave markfromireland |
Resistance Growing Up at School KHALDIYA, Oct 12 (IPS) - The bomb went off just outside the school as the IPS correspondent stood speaking to children and teachers within. The headmaster smiled. "You will hear many of these every day if you stay here another day or two," he said. "The resistance will not stop until the last American leaves." The children too took no notice of the blast, which shook the doors and windows of the half-destroyed school in this town near Fallujah, 70km west of Baghdad. The children are growing up in occupied Iraq - and they are resisting it. "Americans are bad," said 11-year-old Mustafa. "They killed my family." The family were killed in Operation Phantom Fury of November 2004 as they tried to flee the city, teachers said. That operation killed thousands and destroyed much of Fallujah and towns around it. "God will send all Americans to hellfire," cried another child in the classroom. Attempts to suggest that not everyone they thought American was bad proved fruitless. "How can we teach them forgiveness when they see Americans killing their family members every day," the teacher in the classroom who gave her name as Shyamaa told IPS. "Words cannot cover the stream of blood and these signs of destruction, and words cannot hide the daily raids they see." For the headmaster, the idea of a clash of civilisations is not just an idea. "The gap between civilisations is widening thanks to the U.S. administration's crimes against humanity all over the world," he said. "They seem determined to tear the world apart, and their footprints cannot be removed for the coming generations." [snip] Three to four U.S. soldiers are being killed every day on average in such attacks now. The U.S. Department of Defence says at least 2,754 U.S. soldiers have been killed in Iraq, and more than 44,000 have been wounded or have fallen ill. U.S. troops are vacating towns, but not the country. Top U.S. military commander Gen. Peter Schoomaker said Wednesday the current level of U.S. troops, about 15 brigades, would be maintained at least through 2010. "This is not a prediction that things are going poorly or better, it's just that I have to have enough ammo in the magazine that I can continue to shoot as long as they want us to shoot," he said. From IPS News markfromireland |
Dear British Readers,
So here's the first question. It's a friendly question just between neighbours. What did you do today to hold George Bush's bestest friend Tony to account? Or if you did nothing can I take it that you actually like Britain being an American colony that always does what it's told? Do you think that's why those dead British soldiers joined? To fight for a pack of thieving American polticians who when they're not busy taking Makes me glad I'm not British. How does it make you feel? Britain used to be a decent county. Once. What are you going to do to get her back? markfromireland |
The study "The Human Cost of the War in Iraq" will be published in the Lancet. The full text of the study can be downloaded from here as a PDF file. I've turned the summary page into XHTML and posted it immediately below. I'm going through the report now and at present don't have much to add beyond the following:
I'll do a longer posting on this at the weekend. Probably on Friday after the survey is published.
markfromireland |
You can download the files from here on the Federation of American Scientists "Project on Government Secrecy" site. You won't enjoy reading it. It makes it crystal clear exactly what level of help and protection civilians will get. The Republican party - making sure that every American markfromireland |
The body in the coffin is this lady's 17 year old son. Abdur Rahman and a friend were asked to help some women move from Dora in Baghdad. Ad-Dora used to be mixed it's now becoming mostly Sunni. I've lost track of the number of times it's been "pacified," "cleared," "swept." The latest "pacification" was just a few days or ago. "Pacified." Yeah right. Tell that to Abdur. Oh, silly me, you can't, he's dead. He was asked to help some neighbours move. They didn't dare live there any more and being a decent kid he helped. And died. markfromireland |
I have a severe problem with the photograph and supplied text below:
The problem I have is this. Iraqi soldiers may get immediate emergency treatment at US facilities when they're injured. But they sure as hell get shifted out of there and into an Iraqi hospital as fast as possible. Moreover once they're in the Iraqi hospital they have to pay for their treatment. (Nor does a disabled Iraqi soldier get any sort of pension or aftercare.) The photo and accompanying text lead readers to assume that wounded Iraqi soldiers get equal access to the same superb medical treatment that US soldiers get in the US army medical system, and that's just not true. Then American commanders gripe about how reluctant Iraqi soldiers are to take risks. If the US occupiers display a complete lack of loyalty to their Iraqi janissaries they can't expect to get loyalty in return. markfromireland |
ننشر هنا ملاحظاتكم عن السلوكيات الطائفية والعرقية التي يمارسها الاشخاص والمؤسسات والاحزاب والواجهات الاخرى و التي تلحق ضررا بالوحدة الوطنية للعراقيين . فاكتبوا الينا لكي نباشر فضح كل من يمس وحدتنا واخواتنا وتماسكنا ، لنعزل اعداء الهوية الوطنية ونوثق افعالهم للتاريخ ونضعهم في القائمة السوداء... ترسل الكتابات على الايميل التالي سر النجاح على الدوام هو أن تسير إلى الأما markfromireland |
General Amer al-Hashemi Iraqi Vice-President's Tariq al-Hashemi brother has been assasinated [Arabic language]. , Tariq al-Hashemi leads the (Sunni) Iraqi Islamic Party, al-Hashemi's sister Meysoun was assasinated last April 27th (as was his brother Mahmoud two weeks previously.) According to Aswat al Iraq [previous Arabic Language link] the general who held a post as an adviser in the Defense ministry. Was killed by gunmen who stormed his home.
They also abducted his bodyguards. There is no news yet of their fate. Al-Hashemi is well known for his trenchant criticism of the presence of foreign troops in Iraq his calls for putting a timetable for their withdrawal and, crucially, for his insistence on disarming the militias. markfromireland update: See also this mix 'em gather 'em feeble attempt at a round upAP News reprort on Yahoo News. - mfi Update 2:Abdullah Al-Sabbagh was kidnapped during the assasination. - mfi |